Particracy Forum
Requests: Classic Edition - Printable Version

+- Particracy Forum (https://ptr.zanz2.dev/_forum)
+-- Forum: Out of Character (OOC) (https://ptr.zanz2.dev/_forum/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Discussion (https://ptr.zanz2.dev/_forum/forum-52.html)
+--- Thread: Requests: Classic Edition (/thread-130.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - hyraemous - 31-10-2024

The two above requests will be sent for review.


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Kubrick - 31-10-2024

(30-10-2024, 04:20 PM)dannypk Wrote: I have passed an RP law prohibiting any non-socialist party in Istalia (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=708024), caused by the recent events in Istalia (one, two, three). OOC, I don't seek to stop players from playing in Istalia, but I'm hoping that they adopt a socialist ideology (whatever it may be), as the RP I'm coordenating with several other nations requires a socialist government, particularly Istalia's feud with Pontesi and Kafuristan and its allies over their opposition to a socialist/communist government in Istalia. Similarly, since we are planning to RP a Socialist International with other nations such as Xsampa and Baltusia - which would likely get involved in the previous RP - it's important that no non-socialist party can stop either of these RPs from developing. 

If there's need for more justification, tell me so.

Hello dannypk,

In its current form we are hesitant to approve your RP law as binding and we think it would benefit from clarity. Let me explain in some detail, banning non-socialist parties as a whole makes for a very narrow window in which players can still participate in Istalia. While your party and its line are even mentioned, it is officially a communist party. Opinions on this differ of course, but to some of us communism is separate from socialism and with that interpretation you would also outlaw yourself. Another point is that it also calls to ban every party that opposes the dictatorship of the proletariat, which we know is a term often used in far-left rhetoric but some interpretations could then even argue you wish for a one party state.

All in all we think your RP law would benefit from being rewritten in closer detail. Perhaps change the wording to something like only allowing "leftist anti-capitalist parties that are united in maintaining Istalia as a leftist nation". This means that you can also have participating players that are social democratic, democratic socialist, communist, all the other flavours of the red ideology.

We hope this clarifies our stance and we hope you make another law. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out, we are happy to help you along the way.


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Autokrator - 31-10-2024

http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=47748 

This account hasnt logged in for 7 days. Can you please inactivate them?


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - journey - 01-11-2024

(31-10-2024, 07:10 PM)Autokrator Wrote: http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=47748 

This account hasnt logged in for 7 days. Can you please inactivate them?

Donzo.


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Flip - 02-11-2024

Similiar to danny I want to restrict rp in Zardugal a bit. Not that I expect a lot of players coming in atm. I just already put quite a bit of work into the nation and want to be sure to not have it overthrown by anyone who prefers doing that rather than starting something from scratch in an empty nation (been there, done that, not proud of it, so I know what I'm talking about haha). I'd like to hear what moderation thinks about the bill (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=708092) before actually passing it. Thanks!


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Elena1012 - 03-11-2024

(02-11-2024, 01:37 PM)Flip Wrote: Similiar to danny I want to restrict rp in Zardugal a bit. Not that I expect a lot of players coming in atm. I just already put quite a bit of work into the nation and want to be sure to not have it overthrown by anyone who prefers doing that rather than starting something from scratch in an empty nation (been there, done that, not proud of it, so I know what I'm talking about haha). I'd like to hear what moderation thinks about the bill (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=708092) before actually passing it. Thanks!

Unfortunately, we have chosen to deny this for now. As it stands, we would like to see more activity from Zardugal. We would like to see at least another week or two of activity. 
If that can be done, we would be happy to approve as is written.


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - dannypk - 04-11-2024

(31-10-2024, 06:31 PM)Kubrick Wrote:
(30-10-2024, 04:20 PM)dannypk Wrote: I have passed an RP law prohibiting any non-socialist party in Istalia (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=708024), caused by the recent events in Istalia (one, two, three). OOC, I don't seek to stop players from playing in Istalia, but I'm hoping that they adopt a socialist ideology (whatever it may be), as the RP I'm coordenating with several other nations requires a socialist government, particularly Istalia's feud with Pontesi and Kafuristan and its allies over their opposition to a socialist/communist government in Istalia. Similarly, since we are planning to RP a Socialist International with other nations such as Xsampa and Baltusia - which would likely get involved in the previous RP - it's important that no non-socialist party can stop either of these RPs from developing. 

If there's need for more justification, tell me so.

Hello dannypk,

In its current form we are hesitant to approve your RP law as binding and we think it would benefit from clarity. Let me explain in some detail, banning non-socialist parties as a whole makes for a very narrow window in which players can still participate in Istalia. While your party and its line are even mentioned, it is officially a communist party. Opinions on this differ of course, but to some of us communism is separate from socialism and with that interpretation you would also outlaw yourself. Another point is that it also calls to ban every party that opposes the dictatorship of the proletariat, which we know is a term often used in far-left rhetoric but some interpretations could then even argue you wish for a one party state.

All in all we think your RP law would benefit from being rewritten in closer detail. Perhaps change the wording to something like only allowing "leftist anti-capitalist parties that are united in maintaining Istalia as a leftist nation". This means that you can also have participating players that are social democratic, democratic socialist, communist, all the other flavours of the red ideology.

We hope this clarifies our stance and we hope you make another law. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out, we are happy to help you along the way.

I've decided to give more details and not use any terms that might lead to confusion, see if this is clearer and good to go: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=708097

Additionally, if you could please inactivate this party! http://classic.particracy.net/viewuser.php?userid=47625


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Auditorii - 04-11-2024

http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=48034

No changes, etc.


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Infinite1 - 04-11-2024

Hi, Is it possible to inactivate these 2 parties
http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=47420 Over 4 days inactive
http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=48028 No changes
Thanks in advance.


RE: Requests: Classic Edition - Elena1012 - 05-11-2024

(04-11-2024, 08:03 PM)Infinite1 Wrote: Hi, Is it possible to inactivate these 2 parties
http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=47420 Over 4 days inactive
http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=48028 No changes
Thanks in advance.

Done