27-10-2024, 10:24 PM
(27-10-2024, 12:29 PM)hyraemous Wrote:(27-10-2024, 04:36 AM)Auditorii Wrote: I'd like to request control over Statrica, full disclosure that there is intention to be tensions between Statrica and Mina (which I also control). Prior to Bazgaristan's change from what it was, to what is now, Bazgaristan was a well known supporter of Ahmadi terrorism in Dovani and even launched an invasion of western Medina to support a more radical, pro-Ahmadi regime. I'd like to develop Statrica into that sort've role, while also providing something for states in western Dovani and potentially across the pond to be involved in.Farsun, if I recall correctly that'll put you at four nations under your control (Dorvik, Kafuristan, Mina, Statrica) should we approve this. I do not recall someone being in four nations at once in my history of playing in this game (and I haven't heard of anyone doing so either) and what I'm seeing is you want two of them to interact.
The main focus would be on foreign groups funding a Ahmadi revolution and the main government struggling to contain it while actively engaging in a prolonged civil war. As a note, this would be a "slow burn" and the intention to bring some activity further to Dovani, and as such posting would be alongside posts with Mina.
I guess my question is three food:
1. Why not have Mina be in the role you wish to put Stratica in?
2. Why should you control four countries at the present moment, two of which are in the same continent?
3. Why should those countries interact? What would Mina or Stratica gain from these tensions and eventual conflict?
Appreciate a response.
We've had limited instances where players have controlled multiple FBCs while having a second account, memory betrays me in who has had it but it certainly has been far and few between admittedly.
1) Mina's role has been one of stabilization in the region and the sort've "rock" for East Dovani in being not an absolute mess as often FBCs become or turn into. I'm not interested in turning Mina into something as I've got several storylines, such as the Nefa Ahmadi Democratic Republic that I do not want to abandon. This is not to mention that outside of Xsampa, and now Bianjie, there are no real active Dovani-based FBCs. Outside of Dovani, there is only one other active on Temania.
2) FBCs, while on the same have always been a little different and we've had players control FBCs will having active nations on Dovani and in the past we've had people control 2 different FBCs on the same continent (I controlled Mina and Bazgaristan at one point), I don't think thats entirely new. The one thing that was always not allowed, but has been recently allowed with Vascania and Rapa Pile, was invasion and occupation. The only one that comes to mind outside of that and was RPd very well, was Kurageri and Liore of which Chitin did a stellar job RPing.
3) Why shouldn't they interact? While we've implemented rules to prevent FBCs and secondary accounts from interacting with each other, neither nation is going to have an open conflict, nor could they really given the circumstances. There will certainly be tensions, I encourage you to read the situation between Mina and Bazgaristan, but a full on "Hot conflict" will be very unlikely to happen unless planned in the context of a wider Dovani situation.