Community

Each opens in a new tab.

World


Renaming & Cultural Protocol update for Trigunia
#7
(03-02-2026, 02:14 PM)Mbites Wrote:
Quote:Maybe retcon was the wrong word to use, but it is a very major change that I dont see reflected in RP.  While its commendable that you've dabbled in literature in regards to grounding your RP, or for development of your interests, from where I am sitting the rise of the MCN still seems incredibly ridiculous.

By real life standards, the MCN isn't that ridiculous as there has been far more radical clerical movements in Russia during its modern. Furthermore, the uniqueness of Trigunia's polytheistic take on Hosnianism allows for more reasons that led to the appearance of the MCN. However, I do share the idea that the MCN looks ridiculous at first but not acknowledging its existence within the protocol would be foolish. Which means that, I am willing to lower the percentage of the MCN in the proposed culpro from 40% down to at best 25% at worst 20% while the ACN gains the difference so that both the MCN and ACN act as important clerical institutions yet the Augustinians remain the dominant church.

Quote:Sorry for wording this badly. "Erasure" clearly isnt the right word, my line of thought was that this mass of land had been called "Trigunia" for millenia and this short period of it being called "Nadiya" (by some) doesnt really justify the change for me yet.

Personally I think that renaming Trigunia into Nadiya will greatly help players, especially new ones, in understanding the nation. Already, the persons that interact with Trigunia refer to it as Nadiya (even tho I clearly stated multiple times that they're allowed to call it Trigunia or Nadiya interchangeably). Whilst I wouldn't have put such a serious name change request if I didn't intend to stay in this nation for the foreseeable (trying to achieve Doc level of dedications :3), classic PT didn't allow for nations to change names, in legacy players did gain this liberty so the names are something set in stones anymore (Dankuk becoming Beaguk and Beiteynu into Amudim). On top of that I did ask Polites about his thoughts about my renaming process (mainly out of respect for him being the last person that brought major changes to Trigunia) and he did say that it looked good to him. Once again, I am open to comprise over the rename but ideally it should be accepted as it lifts a massive hurdle for players.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Renaming & Cultural Protocol update for Trigunia - by Svetlana - 03-02-2026, 05:17 PM