Luthori

[Ligbruderkrieg]

Taggle enters smartphone market with aim at becoming top company by 5750.
January 5724

Taggle, a start-up founded in Northminster has announced their intention to “break the smartphone market” in communication on social media, the company said that the Luthorian smartphone market is “similar to the state of the world – in decline” and that a “new wave of modern ideas and thinking” was needed to “get the market moving again.”

This bold declaration on social media reflects the company’s wishes to distance itself from its potential rivals, by showing a younger approach in communication, privileging social media to traditional media outlets. CEO Brad Granger announced in a video posted on social media that Taggle was entering the smartphone market following 8 years since their foundation.

“We’re proud to announce that the first iteration of the Tagphone will be released on April 5.” he said in this video address, moreover, he said that the Tagphone will be the “smartphone that will define this new era of technological advancement,” in a stunning show of defiance towards his potential competitors. The Tagphone has been described by his designer as the “most futuristic phone of this generation” a nicknamed which was embraced by the media as well.

The Financial Inquirer’s Sarah Rumsfield tried the new Tagphone ahead of the 5724 Luthorian Tech Expo held in Alchester, from January 28 to March 4.

A simple smartphone, but larger than normal, with an integration of Hallowsoft’s system and the direct integration of VestriAI 3.0, the third iteration of the Luthorian AI within the Tagphone. Adding to this, is one of the highest quality cameras available, with five cameras being placed on the new device.

Simply put, according to Taggle’s owners, the Tagphone will be “THE revelation of the 58th century”.

“We are aiming for excellence, and we believe that this phone will provide both for us and the customers”, a senior official stated. 

The opening prices are set at £1.000, Taggle justifies it by stating the “cost of production far outweighs any lower price that we could have implemented, threatening the economic sustainability of the product”