Amudim

[GreekIdiot]

"Then why did you leave?"; Head of the Saham briefly comments on Beiteynuese-Lodamese conundrum

March 5591

Tel Bira, West Bank - The entire matter of Lodamun's abrupt and unexplained withdrawal from the Neset more than a decade ago has remained under multiple deliberations since the Beiteynuese Ambassador to Kalistan initiated a "mediation discussion" in Kaliburg in 5589.

The remarks issued by the Kalistani Foreign Minister the month after and the Lodamese Secretary of State's comments that same summer seemed to de-escalate concerns with moderates in the Beiteynuese Government. Even the staunchest of officials from both the Nisrad of Yishelem and the Nisrad of Tel Bira - namely from the Agaf and the Saham respectively - calmed down after word came around of Lodamun's ratification of the Migrant Accords and Bannerhafen's continuous mediation attempts in Himmelshtern insofar as Kensington's observer entry to the 3rd Point Federation was concerned.

Thus, the matter was deprioritised over the course of the last couple of years.

However, the newly appointed Narik-Yeudi Head of the Saham, Manfred Legelfein, did not seem entirely persuaded by the arguments of the Lodamese Secretary of State. During an interview with "Limitless Elite", he commented on the matter briefly:

Yes, it is absolutely clear that neither Lodamun nor Kalistan nor even the great Anantonese Empire seek to harm or block the Yeudi People and Yeudish entrepreneurship in North Seleya. That much is clear.

What I've been scratching my head about is the duality of Kensington's statements on bilateral relations.

They seek cordial relations? They left the diplomatic treaty. Shut down embassies and consulates. As much as gov.bei can cover the needs of the Yeudi People across the world, you have to realise that if one side is not willing...well...what can I say.

Want to maintain cordial relations? Leave the structured frameworks put in place by treaties.

Say, perhaps Lodamun ought to consider honouring Kalopia's neutrality by leaving the Kalopian neutrality agre- wait; yup; touche.

Yes, very cordial. Reeks of cordiality.

@Neset