Feedback: Roleplay

[Mbites]

Some of this may be nitpicky, but I mention it in the spirit of polishing, rather than criticizing.

1)  Clarity.  "... clearly communicate what you want to tell and what you do not want to do."  I would say want to do, rather than want to tell.

2)  Elaboration.  "importance of coordinating (large-scale) RP."  Could you maybe give an example of coordination, or a couple of different styles?  I have found that there are different opinions about what constitutes coordination, and having some guidance would be helpful.

7)  Elaboration.  "Economic assets which stand in other nations are not within your control, if another player decides to seize them you cannot force them to engage in conflict to avoid it from happening."  Can you elaborate on this.  For example:  Kalistan has significant economic investment in Gaduridos, but Gaduridos is either about to or has already gone empty.  Does this mean that Kalistan can't access its economic investments in that country once it is empty?  Rule 10 doesn't, in my opinion adequately cover this question, because I wouldn't be asking about expanding those things, just simply using them, which seems to contradict the quite definite language of this rule.

9)  Elaboration.  Can you provide a brief process for retconning?  I think this would be beneficial for individuals who seek to square a country away and want to override things that players who aren't in a country anymore did which is just bizarre or complete out of the character of a nation (like switching from some European civilization to Ancient Egyptian for some reason...)  No particular example in mind, just some additional elaboration here would be helpful.

Thank you for writing these up.

@Doc Thanks for the input on these, I think these are very good points, these will definitly find their way into the rules. Special thanks for pointing 7) out. I'll post the elaboration soon, probably tomorrow, I'll try to write something more clear and simple up, unfortunately hitting the right spot on 7) is gonna be very 'fine' rule-lawyering work.

@Drax Thanks for voicing your opinion.